HJRES111-119

In Committee

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Barred Owl Management Strategy".

119th Congress Introduced Jul 23, 2025

Summary

What This Bill Does

H.J.Res.111 is a Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution. It targets the United States Fish and Wildlife Service rule relating to Barred Owl Management Strategy and provides that the rule shall have no force or effect. The targeted rule concerns barred owl management decisions affecting forest ecosystems, northern spotted owl recovery, and wildlife-management methods. The practical result is not a new replacement rule; it is a congressional veto of the agency action, which can also restrict the agency from issuing a substantially similar rule without new statutory authority.

Who Benefits and How

Timber operators and land managers opposing barred owl controls benefit because disapproval would remove or prevent the regulatory obligations created by the rule. Members of Congress opposing the rule benefit because the CRA provides a direct vehicle to nullify the agency action. Regulated parties benefit from clearer congressional opposition to the rule and less near-term implementation risk. Forest landowners benefit if disapproval reduces federal wildlife-management restrictions or interventions tied to the strategy.

Who Bears the Burden and How

United States Fish and Wildlife Service rulemaking staff must respond to congressional disapproval and may be constrained from issuing a substantially similar rule. Northern spotted owl recovery programs bear the burden if protections, standards, or program changes in the rule are blocked. Congressional oversight committees must handle the policy consequences of removing the rule without passing a replacement. Wildlife biologists and conservation groups lose a management tool intended to protect threatened owl populations.

Key Provisions

  • Provides congressional disapproval of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service rule relating to Barred Owl Management Strategy.
  • Blocks the rule by declaring that it shall have no force or effect.
  • Uses the Congressional Review Act rather than ordinary notice-and-comment rulemaking.
  • Restricts the agency's ability to issue a substantially similar rule unless Congress authorizes it.

Evidence Chain:

This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.

At a Glance

What This Bill Does

Uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the United States Fish and Wildlife Service rule relating to Barred Owl Management Strategy, causing that rule to have no force or effect.

Key Policy Areas

Administrative Law, Congressional Review Act

Primary Purpose

Uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the United States Fish and Wildlife Service rule relating to Barred Owl Management Strategy, causing that rule to have no force or effect.

Policy Domains

Administrative Law Congressional Review Act

Resolution provisions

Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • Timber operators and land managers opposing barred owl controls
  • Members of Congress opposing the rule
  • Regulated parties
  • Congressional oversight committees
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service rulemaking staff
  • Northern spotted owl recovery programs
  • Congressional oversight committees
  • Program administrators
Model: codex-gpt-5 | Version: bill_summary_v2 | Source: ih

Contextual inference, no direct clause citation

Legislative Progress

In Committee
Introduced Committee Passed
Jul 23, 2025

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Jul 23, 2025

Introduced in House

Stakeholder Effects

cui bono?

How this legislation distributes effects. Mention counts reflect frequency, not effect magnitude.

Fishing & Forestry
1 mention across 1 clause
+1 positive

Timber operators

Government
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

United States Fish and Wildlife Service rulemaking staff

Environment
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Northern spotted owl recovery programs

Research & Science
1 mention across 1 clause
-1 negative

Wildlife biologists

1/1
sections analyzed
Full impact breakdown

Bill Structure & Actor Mappings

Who is "The Secretary" in each section?

Domains
Administrative Law Congressional Review Act

We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.

Learn more about our methodology