Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Trade Commission relating to ''Negative Option Rule''.
Summary
What This Bill Does
H.J.Res.100 is a Congressional Review Act disapproval resolution. It targets the Federal Trade Commission rule relating to Negative Option Rule and provides that the rule shall have no force or effect. The targeted rule concerns recurring subscriptions, automatic renewals, and other negative-option marketing practices, so disapproval would block the FTC's updated consumer-protection framework. The practical result is not a new replacement rule; it is a congressional veto of the agency action, which can also restrict the agency from issuing a substantially similar rule without new statutory authority.
Who Benefits and How
Subscription businesses benefit because disapproval would remove or prevent the regulatory obligations created by the rule. Members of Congress opposing the rule benefit because the CRA provides a direct vehicle to nullify the agency action. Regulated parties benefit from clearer congressional opposition to the rule and less near-term implementation risk. Online sellers and membership clubs benefit if disapproval removes cancellation, consent, and disclosure duties imposed by the rule.
Who Bears the Burden and How
Federal Trade Commission rulemaking staff must respond to congressional disapproval and may be constrained from issuing a substantially similar rule. Consumers enrolled in automatic renewal plans bear the burden if protections, standards, or program changes in the rule are blocked. Congressional oversight committees must handle the policy consequences of removing the rule without passing a replacement. Consumer protection offices may lose a rule designed to make recurring charges and cancellation terms easier for consumers to understand.
Key Provisions
- Provides congressional disapproval of the Federal Trade Commission rule relating to Negative Option Rule.
- Blocks the rule by declaring that it shall have no force or effect.
- Uses the Congressional Review Act rather than ordinary notice-and-comment rulemaking.
- Restricts the agency's ability to issue a substantially similar rule unless Congress authorizes it.
Evidence Chain:
This summary is generated from the full bill text using AI analysis. Expand "Detailed Analysis" below for identified beneficiaries/burden bearers.
At a Glance
What This Bill Does
Uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the Federal Trade Commission rule relating to Negative Option Rule, causing that rule to have no force or effect.
Key Policy Areas
Administrative Law, Congressional Review Act
Primary Purpose
Uses the Congressional Review Act to disapprove the Federal Trade Commission rule relating to Negative Option Rule, causing that rule to have no force or effect.
Policy Domains
Resolution provisions
Identified Gains
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation- Subscription businesses
- Members of Congress opposing the rule
- Regulated parties
- Congressional oversight committees
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
Identified Costs
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation- Federal Trade Commission rulemaking staff
- Consumers enrolled in automatic renewal plans
- Congressional oversight committees
- Program administrators
Contextual inference, no direct clause citation
Sponsors
Legislative Progress
In CommitteeReferred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Introduced in House
Bill Structure & Actor Mappings
Who is "The Secretary" in each section?
We use a combination of our own taxonomy and classification in addition to large language models to assess meaning and potential beneficiaries. High confidence means strong textual evidence. Always verify with the original bill text.
Learn more about our methodology